Contents
- Identify the decision and the legal objection
- Obtain the notice, minutes and voting record
- Reconsideration by an extraordinary assembly
- The separate time limits for annulment and arbitration
- Urgent suspension has a different test
- Keep the dispute separate from other payment obligations
- Prepare a focused file for legal assessment
- Assess the decision before a deadline passes
A condominium assembly has approved works, divided a cost or imposed a rule that you believe is unlawful. Your next step depends on the decision, how it was adopted, your position as an owner and the dates. An objection to the administrator is not automatically a court challenge.
Preserve the meeting notice, approved minutes and evidence of when you received communications. Ask for prompt advice if implementation is imminent. The procedure to seek urgent suspension has its own ten-day deadline, which should not be confused with the time available for an annulment action.
Identify the decision and the legal objection
Civil Code Article 1433 allows an owner who did not approve a resolution to seek annulment where it is contrary to the law or previously approved regulations. Disliking the outcome or considering it expensive does not, by itself, establish that legal ground.
Identify the particular resolution and the defect you say affects it. Relevant questions may include whether the meeting was properly called, the subject appeared on the agenda, the required majority was achieved and the allocation or restriction was legally permitted. Voting is not simply one apartment owner, one equal vote: the fraction's share and the rules applicable to the particular decision matter.
Not every alleged defect belongs to the same legal category. Do not assume that describing a decision as void removes the need to act within the ordinary challenge deadlines. Its classification and the appropriate remedy require legal assessment.
An administrator's own act may instead raise the separate route of an appeal to the assembly under Article 1438. First establish whether you are challenging an assembly resolution, an accounting mistake or the administrator's conduct.
Obtain the notice, minutes and voting record
Civil Code Article 1432 sets rules for convening the assembly and communicating decisions. Email is not automatically a valid substitute for every formal notice: the statutory conditions for using it need to be checked. Being abroad or absent does not by itself mean that you were not properly convened.
Request the approved minutes and keep the original notice, envelope, email records and proxies. Under Decree-Law 268/94, Article 1, minutes must record the meeting and decisions, including the voting result, and the administrator must retain them and permit consultation to those entitled to it.
The same provision links the effectiveness of resolutions to approval of the minutes, regardless of whether all owners have already signed them. A missing signature is not, by itself, proof that the decision has no effect. Preserve evidence of approval, attendance and how you voted.
Reconsideration by an extraordinary assembly
Article 1433(2) provides a specific route to ask the administrator to convene an extraordinary assembly to revoke invalid or ineffective resolutions. The request must be made within ten days of the resolution for an owner who was present, or within ten days of its communication for an absent owner. The extraordinary assembly is to take place within twenty days of the request.
Make the request and its delivery provable. An informal email saying that you disagree should not be assumed to satisfy the statutory request or preserve every other remedy. Specify the resolution and obtain advice on the required form and timing.
If a requested meeting is delayed or never held, do not wait on the assumption that every court deadline has stopped. That procedural situation needs prompt assessment on its own facts.
The separate time limits for annulment and arbitration
Article 1433(4) states that the right to bring an annulment action expires twenty days after the extraordinary assembly's resolution or, where that meeting has not been requested, sixty days after the original resolution. The statute's sixty-day limb runs from the resolution, not a general sixty days from receipt of the minutes.
Absence from the original meeting is therefore not a safe reason to wait for a fresh sixty-day period. Give the lawyer the meeting date, convening evidence, communication dates and any extraordinary-meeting request so the applicable deadline can be checked. Do not infer an extension from continuing negotiations.
Article 1433(3) also provides for submission to an arbitration centre within thirty days, counted from the resolution for those present or its communication for absent owners. The centre's competence and the conditions for using that route must be checked; this is not a promise that any centre will accept the dispute.
These routes have different starting events. This guide does not turn them into a single appeal period or a deadline calculator. The correct proceeding, parties and representation must also be identified before filing.
Need help with this?
Our legal team handles this process end to end. Get a clear assessment and a concrete plan.
Assess my condominium disputeUrgent suspension has a different test
If carrying out the decision threatens appreciable harm, a court application for suspension may be relevant alongside the challenge to its validity. Civil Procedure Code Articles 380 to 383 govern this procedure, with Article 383 applying it, with the necessary adaptations, to voidable condominium assembly resolutions.
Article 380 provides a ten-day period counted from the assembly or, if the applicant was not regularly convened, from learning of the resolution. This exception concerns defective convening, not every owner who chose not to attend. The application must establish the relevant standing and show the appreciable harm that execution may cause.
Suspension is not automatic merely because an objection appears arguable. Article 381 allows the court to refuse suspension where the resulting harm would exceed the harm from execution. Explain the practical urgency with documents, dates and evidence rather than relying only on the allegation that the vote was unlawful.
Article 381(3) also attaches a prohibition on executing the challenged resolution to formal service of the suspension proceedings, pending the first-instance decision on the request. Formal service is a procedural event; your complaint email or the act of filing should not be treated as its substitute.
Keep the dispute separate from other payment obligations
Do not assume that disputing one resolution allows you to stop all condominium contributions. Identify the affected amount, any undisputed payments and the legal effect of the particular challenge or court order.
Qualifying condominium minutes can support enforcement under Article 6 of Decree-Law 268/94. If you receive formal collection or enforcement papers, the response to those proceedings needs separate attention. The guide to debt enforcement in Portugal explains that wider process; an exchange with the administrator is not a substitute for responding to formal proceedings.
If the real disagreement is whether you or the seller should pay a contribution after a purchase, start with condominium debts after buying property. Allocation after a transfer and validity of the underlying assembly decision are different questions, even when they concern the same bill.
Prepare a focused file for legal assessment
- Proof of ownership and identification of the affected fraction.
- The meeting notice, agenda, delivery records and any proxy.
- The approved minutes, attendance list and voting result.
- The condominium regulations and the relevant part of the constitutive title.
- The works proposal, budget, charge calculation or rule being challenged.
- Your communications, any extraordinary-meeting request and evidence of threatened implementation or harm.
Keep the dates in a short chronology and identify the outcome you need: correction, revocation, annulment, suspension or a defence to a payment claim. The appropriate route may require action before every document has arrived, so flag urgent dates at the first contact.
Assess the decision before a deadline passes
Send the resolution, meeting and notification dates, your voting position and details of any imminent works or collection proceedings. THE-Ö can assess the dispute and the appropriate next step, including whether urgent procedural action needs to be considered.
